Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
Another disappointing summer blockbuster
Spencer Taylor
Issue date: 5/14/09 Section: Arts & Entertainment
|
With his first year of college fast approaching, Sam Witwicky (Shia LeBeouf) is once again thrust into the center of the battle between the Autobots and the Decepticons. Optimus Prime and the other Autobots have formed a joint taskforce with the United States and together they hunt down the Decepticons hidden around the planet. When the Decepticons resurrect Megatron, it's up to Sam and the Autobots to stop them.
The plot is slightly more detailed than this, but overall the story is extremely bland and horribly predictable. At times, it feels as if the movie is just making it up as it goes along, referring to past summer blockbusters to provide a blue print for the plot. You can count on plenty of "slow-motion running through explosions" scenes, and it felt like that was all the last thirty minutes of the movie was.
The average moviegoer, however, does not come to see this movie for the plot.
Even Transformers knows not to take itself too seriously.
Transformers is, from the outset, nothing more than an effects powerhouse to please the ear and the eye, but the movie fails to be noticeably bigger and better than the first. The majority of the big battle scenes were featured in the trailers and TV spots in the months leading up before the film's release, so you've already seen what there really is to see.
You can count on plenty of scenes with Megan Fox, but unfortunately, her character simply fills the role of on-screen eye candy. Likewise, none of the characters in the story seemed to develop, and were there simply to enhance the CG robots that everyone came to see.
To accompany a bland story and ho-hum visual effects, Transformers took several poor attempts at humor that may have been appreciated by the twelve year old kids in the audience.
Sam's mom eating a weed brownie and repeated scenes of dry humping are two examples of the "original" humor in Transformers. As if it couldn't get any better, Michael Bay has already come under fire for racial stereotypes found in two secondary characters.
In the end, Revenge of the Fallen accomplishes what it set out to do: take your money and give you two hours of explosions.
Indeed, at the time this article is being written, RotF has already turned over a cool $60 million on its Wednesday opening, and is second only to last year's The Dark Knight in opening day sales. Once again, a movie was made not to be good, but it was simply made to make money.
Mission accomplished.
X-Men Origins: Wolverine, Terminator Salvation and now Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen comprises 2009's crap list.
As it now looks, Star Trek was the only decent blockbuster to see this summer, and hopefully it will be joined by Half-Blood Prince when it releases July 15.


Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 16
Movie Luva
posted 6/26/09 @ 12:23 PM CST
I love to read reviews written by people that hate movies. Summer blockbusters are not supposed to win awards. They are supposed to make a profit for the share holders of the production company. (Continued…)
Smiggit
posted 6/26/09 @ 6:40 PM CST
Hey Movie Luber,
You're in the severe minority of people that actually thought this movie was good. Even the fans are up in arms about it.
I doubt this guy "hates movies" just because he hates Transformers 2. (Continued…)
Nathan
posted 6/27/09 @ 12:48 AM CST
This movie was very good and every one that has seen it has told me the same thing. I don't know how all the action could be in the previews because the entire movie was almost nothing but action. (Continued…)
Luke
posted 6/27/09 @ 2:42 PM CST
Wow, I went to the movie expecting it to be good at best and was blown away. This movie was amazing and I would see it again in a heartbeat. If the pacer is going to have movie reviews, they need to have somebody with some taste in movies. (Continued…)
melisa
posted 6/29/09 @ 8:16 AM CST
This movie was great!! I took my 3 year old son and he didn't move at all. It was so much better than the first. More action and more comedy! Go see it. (Continued…)
you sir are
posted 6/29/09 @ 9:34 AM CST
Spencer you are gay you might want the new sisterhood of the traveling pants to come out; but Transformers was the shit. we all know what taste you have in movies. (Continued…)
Lobo
posted 6/29/09 @ 10:19 AM CST
I agree with the author on some things, but I don't think the movie was as bad as he makes it out to be. The movie is odd in the fact that in some facets it seems like a movie for kids (the humor is very childish and annoying. (Continued…)
Carl
posted 6/29/09 @ 6:39 PM CST
I have to agree with the author here. It really is nothing but an explosion movie with a weak plot. It got pretty old for me, but I guess some people just like nothing but action in a film. (Continued…)
melisa
posted 6/29/09 @ 7:10 PM CST
I am glad to see so many people reading the Pacer! Overall, the movie is a reflection of a childs cartoon. A great cartoon that I grew up on. Yes, I am in my 30's. (Continued…)
leslie
posted 7/01/09 @ 11:21 AM CST
This movie was not horrible. It does have a simple plot but when you think about it transformers is targeted to a young audience. I watched transformers when i was 8 or 9 yrs old so having it made into a movie that suits that age group seems like a good idea to me. (Continued…)
Post a Comment